Five Themes of Policy Making-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Questions: 1.Discuss and reflect on one Significant Issue raised by the Speaker in the video. 2.Locate the Issue in Broader Social Policy Debates in Literature. Answers: In an interview about policy making, Caroline Amirtharajah discusses five themes of policy making namely; the values that drive policy making, social problems identification, policy formulation and instrumentation, policy implementation, and the evaluation theme (Making Social Policy, 2016). Caroline discusses how advocacy and interest groups help local government in policies implementation after identification of social problems. In the interview, she argues that social justice, fairness, and equity drive policy making by health and wellbeing planners in the local government. Policy making is identified as a complex process considering ideological aspects by different decision makers. In her discussion, domestic imbalances and politicking bring about ideological perspectives to policy making, and this affects decision-making by local government. Policy making and public health professional values face tensions from the community. There is politicking when it comes to funding from the state government due to policies differences between government levels. She highlights that resolving domestic imbalances at the local government level is affected by the ideological aspects of policy makers at the higher policy making authorities (Making Social Policy, 2016). She states that personal responsibility by the less social economic areas results to health policies variance. Politics by state government affects the funding of certain areas health community projects. This political positioning affects consultation by the concerned parties. She states her strong advocacy to consultative decision making when designing health plans and public health Act in state planning. However, she declares that it is difficult to please everybody. In the interview, it is argued that community involvement in planning health Acts helps policy makers use the legislative frameworks by the government in social problems identification (Making Social Policy, 2016). While community ideas, consultation, and use of national data for different communities help in problem prioritization, politicking based on ideological inequities hinder decision making. Ideological aspects create personal differences in policy coordination. She argues that networking and personal relationship building improves coordination due to increased collaboration. In previous work evaluation, proper accounts and community involvement are critical. The interviewee states that this process is marred with dilemmas due to different community lifestyles and ideological differences by the state government (Making Social Policy, 2016). The consultation of state, advocacy groups, NGOs, and citizens results to conflicting ideas which must be considered in decision making. In conclusion, policy making by local governments is messy with the increased ideological aspects of policy making by policy makers due to domestic imbalances and politicking. Supporting health and wellbeing of the community by the local government is under a state of government funding violence. As a result, this has led to policy implementation and evaluation inconsistencies by the local government. 2.Allowing different communities and state governments create their policies, this results in conflict management. Federalism, known to arise from political ideologies as discussed above allows advocacies and other interested parties with irreconcilable differences and sharp disagreements to create their resolutions (Minkler Wallerstein, 2012). Delivering social justice by the local government depends on the social determination, empathy, and equity of policy makers. However, ideological aspects of policy making by the stakeholders involved by local authorities in decision-making has made policymaking a messy process (Young, 2011). Different communities have different political positioning, and the local government policies differ from community ideas on policy formulation. In advocacy, advocacy groups such as the NGO's, citizens, and the federal state authorities get involved in the consultation process by policy makers. Community consultation, childcare groups, senior citizens, and online social media platforms get used in ideas formulation (Tiernan, 2011). In the coordination between different tiers of government, sampling methods get used for policy interventions. However, funding and the project timeline by the local governments determine policy instrumentation. With funding the central dilemma to policy-making in local authorities, politicking mars the entire prospect due to political positioning differences by the state government hence creating less space in the community References Making Social Policy. (October 24, 2016). Caroline Amirtharajah [Video file]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoA9CTmcaso Minkler, M., Wallerstein, N. (2012). Introduction to community organizing and community building.Community organizing and community building for health and welfare, 5-26. Tiernan, A. (2011). Advising Australian federal governments: Assessing the evolving capacity and role of the Australian public service.Australian Journal of Public Administration,70(4), 335-346. Young, I. M. (2011).Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.